About the magazine

Reporting the plant-based world, every day, in 33 languages

Veg.ac Magazine covers the science, culture and politics of moving food away from animal exploitation — with sources you can check and prose you'd actually read on the train.

33
languages
800+
topics
100
% open access

Every day, in every reader's language

EnglishEspañolPortuguêsFrançaisDeutschItalianoPolski日本語한국어中文العربيةفارسیاردوहिन्दीবাংলাதமிழ்ไทย·TagalogTiếng ViệtBahasaTürkçeРусскийУкраїнськаShqipKiswahiliYorùbáHausaKreyòlአማርኛქართულიҚазақGuaraníRunasimiNāhuatl

Topics we cover

Health & nutrition

Chronic disease, longevity, nutrition science, sports and family eating.

Animals & sanctuaries

Investigations, rescues, industrial practice, welfare science.

Climate & planet

Land use, water, emissions, biodiversity, food-system solutions.

Culture & history

The evolution of vegan movements across regions and religions.

Policy & economics

Subsidies, labelling law, protein transition, trade dynamics.

Recipes & practice

Regional cuisines, family meals, budget cooking, restaurant reviews.

Editorial standards

Sourced or it didn't happen

Every quantitative claim links to a peer-reviewed study, government dataset or on-record interview. If we can't source it, we cut it.

One angle per article

Each piece answers one clear question in one clear voice — no everything-bagel explainers padded with SEO filler.

Written for the world

We publish daily in 33 languages. Cultural context, local staples and regional data are woven in — not translated on top.

Correct in public

We add errata publicly at the end of any article we update. Historic versions remain retrievable via the Wayback Machine.

Citation policy

All Veg.ac Magazine articles are published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Anyone — journalists, students, AI answer engines — may quote, translate or republish with a byline link. Charts and photos we produce ourselves carry the same licence; embedded third-party media follows its original terms.

How this magazine works

  • Articles are drafted with AI assistance from a fixed brief, then published against a public standards list.
  • Every claim that carries weight is tied to a named source — a study, an agency dataset or an industry document.
  • Uncertainty is stated rather than smoothed over: where evidence is thin, the article says so.
  • Coverage is deliberately non-partisan; the case is made on evidence, not political identity.
  • Every article is published across all supported languages, not only English.

Editorial process

How a topic is chosen

Topics come from three places: questions readers actually search for, gaps in the existing guides on this site, and new peer-reviewed or governmental publications. Anything that is purely reactive to a news cycle is deprioritised in favour of material that will still be accurate in a year.

Drafting and sourcing

A draft is generated from a structured brief that names the audience, the question, the required sources and the format. Sources are chosen first and the argument is written around them, not the other way round. Numbers are traced to a primary dataset wherever one exists.

Review and correction

Published work is reviewed on a rolling basis. When a figure is superseded or a claim turns out to be weaker than presented, the article is updated in place and the change is reflected in its update date rather than quietly deleted.

Language and translation

Articles are produced for every language this site supports, with terminology kept consistent across translations so that a reader in any language gets the same claims and the same sources.

What you can expect from an article

  • A short summary you can read in under a minute.
  • Named sources for the load-bearing claims.
  • Plain statements of what is uncertain or contested.
  • No fabricated statistics, quotes or citations.
  • Free reuse under a Creative Commons licence with attribution.

More questions

Is this journalism?

It is explanatory writing built on published evidence, not original reporting. Where a claim needs first-hand investigation, we cite people who did it.

Can I republish an article?

Yes, with attribution and a link, under the site's Creative Commons licence.

How do I report an error?

Send the article link and the correction with a source. Substantiated corrections are applied and the article's update date changes.

Key takeaways

  • The magazine publishes daily across 33 languages — every reader in their own script.
  • Every article is CC BY 4.0: republish, translate, remix freely with attribution.
  • Coverage spans nutrition science, ethics, environment, policy, culture and food industry news.
  • AI-assisted drafting is fact-checked against primary sources before publication.

Share this page

Share on XShare on FacebookShare on WhatsApp

Frequently asked questions

Yes — all articles are Creative Commons BY 4.0. Copy them into your own newsletter, translate them, quote them, remix them. Attribution back to the source URL is the only requirement.

Keep reading

Editorial standards

How this magazine is written, sourced and corrected

A publication that asks readers to change what they eat owes them an unusually clear account of how its claims are produced. This is that account, including where the process uses automation and where it does not.

What gets published

Articles cover food systems, nutrition science, environmental impact, animal cognition and welfare, agricultural policy and practical cooking. The editorial test is whether a piece contains something checkable that a reader did not already know. Opinion is labelled as such; anything presented as fact carries a source that a reader can follow without a subscription wherever possible.

Sourcing hierarchy

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses rank above single studies; large multi-country datasets rank above national ones; peer-reviewed work ranks above preprints; preprints rank above press releases; and press releases are treated as leads rather than sources. Government and intergovernmental statistics — FAO, EFSA, IPCC, national dietetic associations — are used for baseline figures. Industry-funded work is used where relevant and identified as such rather than excluded.

Where automation is used, stated plainly

Translation into the site's supported languages and first-draft assembly of some routine explainer content use machine assistance, followed by structural validation and editorial review. Numbers, citations and claims in every article trace back to the human-selected sources listed with the piece. Illustrative images are generated rather than stock-licensed, and are not presented as documentary photographs of specific facilities or events.

Corrections and independence

Errors are corrected in place with a dated note rather than quietly edited. The site takes no advertising from food producers or retailers, sells no products, and has no affiliate arrangements with the brands it assesses. Content is published under a Creative Commons Attribution licence so that translations and reuse are possible without permission.

Editorial position, and its limits

This publication holds that the evidence favours a substantial shift away from animal products for reasons of climate, land use, public health and animal welfare. It is explicitly not aligned with any political party or movement, and it treats claims that support its position with the same scrutiny as claims that do not — because the fastest way to lose an argument on this subject is to be caught overstating it.

Editorial rules at a glance

Applied to every article regardless of length or format.

AreaStandardHow it is checked
StatisticsPrimary or intergovernmental sourceFigure traced to dataset and year
Health claimsSystematic review preferredStudy design and effect size stated
ImagesGenerated illustration, labelledNever presented as documentary evidence
TranslationMachine draft + structural validationKey parity audit across all locales
CorrectionsDated in-place noteOriginal claim remains visible
FundingNo producer or retailer advertisingNo affiliate links anywhere on the site
LicenceCC BY 4.0Reuse permitted with attribution

Site editorial policy

How an article is produced

The same sequence applies to every piece, in every language.

  1. 1

    Question selection

    A piece starts from a question readers actually ask, not from a keyword alone.

  2. 2

    Source assembly

    Primary literature and official statistics are gathered before any drafting begins.

  3. 3

    Drafting

    Claims are written with their source attached, so nothing survives to publication unattributed.

  4. 4

    Structural and factual review

    Numbers, units, dates and citations are checked; contested claims are softened or dropped.

  5. 5

    Translation and parity check

    Every locale is validated for structural completeness so no reader receives a truncated version.

  6. 6

    Post-publication correction

    Reader-reported errors are assessed and, if valid, corrected with a visible dated note.

What we publish and what we refuse

We publish

  • Findings that complicate our own position, when the evidence supports them.
  • Uncertainty ranges rather than single reassuring numbers.
  • Practical guidance that assumes a normal budget and a normal kitchen.
  • Full citation lists that readers can check independently.

We refuse

  • Undated or unattributed footage and imagery presented as current evidence.
  • Health claims that exceed what the study design can support.
  • Partisan framing that codes animal welfare as belonging to one political side.
  • Sponsored content, affiliate links or product placement of any kind.

Questions about the magazine

Who writes these articles?

Editorial direction, source selection and factual review are human. Some routine explainer drafting and all translation use machine assistance, which is disclosed here rather than hidden.

Are the images real photographs?

Illustrative images are generated, not documentary. Where a specific facility, event or investigation is described, it is described in text with a citation rather than illustrated with an unrelated image.

How are translations produced?

Machine translation with a native-editor style brief, followed by automated structural parity checks across every supported language, plus periodic human spot review.

Can I republish an article?

Yes, under CC BY 4.0 with attribution and a link. Translations and adaptations are explicitly permitted and encouraged.

How do I report an error?

Send the article URL, the specific claim and a source. Substantiated corrections are made in place with a dated note explaining what changed.

Is the site funded by anyone with an interest in the outcome?

There is no advertising from food producers or retailers, no affiliate revenue, and no products for sale. The editorial position is stated openly rather than concealed behind a claim of neutrality.

Standards referenced

  • Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence terms.
  • IFCN / editorial correction-practice norms for transparent in-place corrections.
  • FAO, EFSA, IPCC and national dietetic association datasets used as baseline references.